Aristocratic Elite would be the straightforward answer, and the government being spiritualist implies that (at least most/some of) the nobles would also be. You can't exactly use Exalted Priesthood (which is a shame), and while you can use Philosopher King, it's such a pointless civic that it feels like a waste even when roleplaying. The real question is what the second (and later third) civic should be. The last ethic point goes into xenophobia, since not only does it allow purging (and as spiritualists, that would also imply spiritual "purge the heretics" purgings), but it gives all kinds of first contact diplomatic greetings that would fit in nicely with the Imperium's. You couldn't very well replicate psionics and the warp without, well, psionics, jump drives, and the shroud. IIRC, the Imperial Cult civic is meant to be a reference to 40k's Imperium of Man, so that puts you down as authoritarian, spiritualist, and imperial rule already.Īctually, the vast majority of spiritualist mechanics are 40k references, with varying degrees of subtlety. If you don't agree please say why, don't just downwote or I'll just consider you a cultist My opinion : this one is harder because the game limits civics and ethics you can chose spiritualist - imperial cult xenophobe - fear of xeno and abhorrence of the unknown authoritarian - technically an empire and has nobility and shit militaristic - entire world dedicated so that humanity can fight oligarchic rule - emperor is incapacitated and the empire is ruled by the elite, the high lords of Terra and the Ecclesiarchy/nobility Exalted Priesthood - Ecclesiarchy police state - inquisiton civics could be changed to show different aspects of the Imperium Imperium with Emperor on the chair - spiritualistic, xenofobic/militaristic, authoritarian/militaristic oligarchic rule, civics - Exalted Priesthood, Police State
How to play stellaris imperium of man full#
Materialist - imperial truth, but NO ROBOTS militarist - 40k and massive mobilization plus focus on military might authoritarian - emperor in his full glory Emperor never wanted himself to be called a God and would kill you for it, heck it was one of the reasons for the Heresy, that some primarch felt he was going from his convictions while another was butthurt that the Emperor rejected his religion (and purged his world) Imperium with Emperor commanding - materialistic, militaristic, authoritarian imperial rule civics - Philosopher King and maybe Post-Apocalyptic/ Warrior Culture/ Distinguished Admiralty Due to limits from mechanics sadly we can't have the cake and eat it :'( So it has been irking me for a bit, but the ethos of the Imperium should depend if people wish to have Emperor represented as fully in control or incapacitated.
0 kommentar(er)
